|
Looks cool. Compared to Star Destroyers and other Imperial ships of much larger sizes, do you think the shields may be too powerful (maybe hull, too)? Was this based on some other ship of comparable size and stats?
[EDIT] I was just looking at the Corellian Corvette stats in the Rebel Alliancce Sourcebook. Considering the nature of the differences between the Galactic Empire and the Rebel Alliance, I do think Imperial ships should be stronger, more durable, to reflect their access to more resources and better, newer technologies, BUT, the EMpire also builds their ships and such to fill specific roles. Considering the role this ship was meant to play, it could have slightly weaker Hull/Shield dice, as it was meant as an anti-starfighter platform, and has the weapons to back this up, a far superior arsenal to the Corellian Corvette. Combined with how these stats give the Raider superior speed over the Corellian Corvette, the present Hull/Shield dice seem a bit overkill. Since the Raider is meant as an anti-starfighter ship, and the Corellian Corvette is more a multi-role ship, O can see the Corellian Corvette having more durability for the many roles it s meant to fill.
Comparison:
Imperial Star Destroyer, 1,600m long, Hull 7D, Shields 3D, = 10D.
Raider-class (as of this comment), 150m long, Hull 5D, Shields 4D, = 9D.
Corellian Corvette, 150m long, Hull 4D, Shields 2D, = 6D.
|
